Thank you. Though I think, besides "alarmist," it sounds like "inaccurate" also applies, from the reading/writeup you did.

As I said when posting it, not doing commentary/research/anything due to being tired, but linking others so they could if they wanted (and, honestly, me to make sure I did later). I don't see anything objectionable about the actual intent/letter of the law, from what you found about it.