![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Are our systems vulnerable? Heck, yes, especially if we're running Windows. But for all the problems found, you'd think all our computers would go down twice a day. And (mostly) they don't. Or, to steal a quote (of Mike Sweeney) from the article:
"But, since it's theoretically possible someone might use this flaw as an attack method, it's reported as a 'security hole.' It's like saying there is a chance your car will roll over in a crash, therefore we will report the car as defective and a risk to you. Duh!"
I suppose I could strain the analogy by trying to make something of it (is Windows the SUV of the computing world, very capable but easily rolled?). But that would be tacky. :)
"But, since it's theoretically possible someone might use this flaw as an attack method, it's reported as a 'security hole.' It's like saying there is a chance your car will roll over in a crash, therefore we will report the car as defective and a risk to you. Duh!"
I suppose I could strain the analogy by trying to make something of it (is Windows the SUV of the computing world, very capable but easily rolled?). But that would be tacky. :)
no subject
And heck, I still run ZoneAlarm and make it check outgoing as well as incoming. Just because it's way over-hyped doesn't mean it's not a risk. And I'd hate to fall victim to what is often an avoidable risk, whether it's small or large.